Regulation 5.17 Migration Regulations – Prescribed evidence of English language proficiency
[5.17] For the purposes of paragraph 5(2)(b) of the Act (dealing with whether a person has functional English), the evidence referred to in each of the following paragraphs is prescribed evidence of the English language proficiency of a person:
(a) evidence specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this paragraph;
[(a) substituted by SLI 2012, 105 with effect from 01/07/2012 – LEGEND note]
[(b) omitted by SLI 2012, 105 with effect from 01/07/2012 – LEGEND note]
(c) evidence that:
(i) the person holds an award (being a degree, a higher degree, a diploma or a trade certificate) that required at least 2 years of full-time study or training; and
(ii) all instruction (including instruction received in other courses for which the person was allowed credit) for that award was conducted in English;
[(d) omitted by SR 1995, 117 – LEGEND note]
(e) evidence that the person has attained the functional level of the ACCESS test, being evidence in the form of a copy of results of a test:
(i) completed not more than 12 months before the person applies for the grant of a visa in relation to which those results are relevant; or
(ii) completed after the application is made;
and certified by the body that conducted the test as the results of the test of the person;
(f) evidence that the person has been assessed as having functional English by the provider of a course that is an approved English course for the purposes of section 4 of the Immigration (Education) Act 1971;
[(g) omitted by SR 1995, 117 – LEGEND note]
(h) in the case of a person who is an applicant for a Business Skills – Established Business (Residence) (Class BH) visa — evidence that the person has a score of at least 20 points under Part 3 of Schedule 7, being a score awarded on the basis of an interview of the person for the purpose of ascertaining that score;
(j) if:
(i) the person is an applicant for a visa of a class that is not mentioned in paragraph (h); and
(ii) evidence referred to in paragraph (a) cannot be provided by the person; and
(iii) it is not reasonably practicable for the person to attend at a place where, or time when, he or she could be subjected to a test mentioned in paragraph (e) or (f);
evidence that the person has been determined by the Minister, on the basis of an interview with the person, to have functional English.
2015 FOI Disclosure Logs
- http://www.border.gov.au/about/access-accountability/freedom-of-information-foi/log/2015Full-time Administration -Graduate Entry
A vacancy at Renu & Associates Asia Pty Ltd -Nepal:
We are currently seeking a technology-savvy and organised individual. This position would be suited to a well presented individual with extremely strong organisational and attention to detail abilities. It is essential that the successful candidate display a friendly disposition as well as have an understanding of the Microsoft Office suite (Word, Excel and PowerPoint).
Contact:
Surya Nath Adhikari
Business Manager -South Asia
RENU MIGRATION SERVICES
http://renumigrationservices.com/
Tel: 977 01 4105080, 4993068
Mobile: 9851172542
E-mail: suryanathadhikari1969@gmail.com
Viber: + 977 9851172542
Skype: surya.nath.adhikari
Twitter: @adhikarisurya